With our RAZR HD review coming around the time that HTC, Sony and
Samsung are unleashing their big guns for 2013, it could seem like a
blast from the past. In terms of specification and price the new RAZR HD
is a great alternative to the Samsung Galaxy S3
- though given how excellent the S3 still is, that could hardly be
judged as a criticism. In some respects the RAZR HD is superior to the
S3, and at least with the RAZR HD you won't be buying a phone that's
about to be so publicly superseded.
The new RAZR HD follows the design cues of previous models. We think it's unashamedly macho...
With the new S4 likely to cost at least £35 on contract, the S3 and
the RAZR HD are comparative bargains at £22 a month on decent two-year
3G contracts (300 mins, 500MB and unlimited texts). The RAZR HD is
4G-capable, though, which puts it one step ahead of the non-LTE S3 that
you get at this price. The RAZR HD isn't currently available on a 4G
contract from EE, but it will work with the other networks when they
roll out their services later this year.
...especially the Kevlar rear panel, although it's not actually bulletproof
Compared to the S3, the RAZR HD comes out on top at first glance.
It's a little iPhone 4-esque, with its squared-off metallic sides, but
the back is pure RAZR. It's covered in carbon-fibre like previous
models, but the material is now wrapped seamlessly around the edges of
the handset. The design not only looks great, it also makes the phone
really easy to hold. Even the power button and volume rocker look good,
as they're slender and made from the same material as the side sections
of the phone. The handset is a little smaller than the S3 in height and
width, but fractionally chunkier at the top end. These differences
aren't surprising, as the RAZR HD has a fractionally smaller screen –
4.7in vs 4.8in – but a larger battery.
Even the ports are eminently practical, with separate HDMI and USB connectors, compared to the Samsung Galaxy S3's combined port
Unlike the S3, there's no removable back plate, which is one of the
reasons the phone feels so much sturdier – it's also splashproof. The
downside of the waterproofing means the battery is sealed away inside
and can't be replaced easily. Thankfully, it's a whopping 2,530mAh
model, which is 20% bigger than that of the S3. This showed in our
tests. The RAZR HD produced an incredible 14 hours and nine minutes in
our constant video playback test, which is four hours more than the
non-LTE S3 and is among the best scores we've ever seen. It's only
beaten by the Motorola RAZR MAXX, with its 19-hour battery life. This is a phone that will last all day, even if you decide to switch to battery-hungry 4G.
That slight bulge at the top end helps contain the RAZR HD's huge battery
Inside is a dual-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm chipset, it's hardly a speed
demon, as shown by a JavaScript SunSpider benchmark score of 1,828ms.
We've seen handsets manage almost twice that score, but Sunspider is
fairly dependent on the phone's browser; the Samsung Galaxy S3 only
managed 1,771ms, and we've never had any complaints about that handset's
browsing performance.
In the GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD test, which shows off a phone's
graphical abilities, the phone scored 22fps, which is far quicker than
our S3's 15fps in the same test. For comparison, the new flagship HTC
One scored 31fps in this benchmark.